back_office_ops · finance · workflow

Markel records 113% productivity increase in underwriting team following Cytora partnership

Markel's underwriting process required senior underwriters to manually triage every incoming submission and re-key risk data across systems, with underwriters spending 30%+ of their time on low-skill tasks — limiting GWP growth without adding headcount.

How it works
Common implementation structure
How this type of workflow is generally built, generalized across documented cases — not tied to any one vendor's stack. Click any stage to read what happens there. Specific products that implement these stages appear in “Tools commonly seen” below.
Stage 1 · Broker submission intake
Cytora's Platform collects broker submissions as the entry point to the digital risk flow.
Tools used
CytoraCytora's Platform
Outcome

Markel achieved a 113% uplift in underwriting productivity (GWP/FTE) and reduced SLA quote turnaround time for strategic partners from 24 hours to 2 hours, with underwriters now focused on decision-ready, high-propensity risks.

Results
Time saved24hrs to 2hrs
Volume113%
Source

https://www.cytora.com/risk-flow-center/blog/case-study-markel-records-113-productivity-increase-in-its-underwriting-team-following-cytora-partnership

How we source this →

Grounding & classification
Source type: vendor customer story
26 fields verified against source quotes.
agentic workflowdata extractionpredictive analyticsform submissionhuman review describedmetric backednamed customerproduction runtime claimedtools describedvendor confirmedworkflow describedinsurancecycle time reductionemployee productivitythroughput increasetime savedvendor customer storyback office opsdata entry opsextract classify routeintake to triage