Build.inc uses LangGraph multi-agent architecture to complete CRE land diligence in 75 minutes versus four weeks manually
Land diligence workflows for energy-intensive CRE projects (data centers, renewable energy) took over four weeks, consumed nearly half of the total project timeline, and cost developers millions of dollars. The fragmented US regulatory landscape and the need for deep specialist expertise made traditional software solutions inadequate.
Traditional software could not handle the complexity and variability, fragmented data ecosystem, and high-stakes specialist requirements of CRE development workflows.
Build.inc's first worker, Dougie, is now in production for CRE industry clients and completes land diligence in 75 minutes—what previously took humans over four weeks—with a depth and quality that human teams cannot match even over the course of several weeks.
Show all 9 reported metrics
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
Build.inc's first worker, Dougie, is now in production for CRE industry clients and completes land diligence in 75 minutes—what previously took humans over four weeks—with a depth and quality that human teams cannot m…
What tools did this team use?
LangGraph, LLMs.
What results were reported?
Land diligence workflow duration (automated): 75 minutes; Land diligence workflow duration (manual): over four weeks; Sub-agent tasks orchestrated: over 25; Individual tasks per sequence workflow: up to 30 (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
Traditional software could not handle the complexity and variability, fragmented data ecosystem, and high-stakes specialist requirements of CRE development workflows.
How is this back office ops AI workflow structured?
Land diligence request initiated → Master Agent orchestrates workflow → Role Agents handle specialized functions → Task Agents execute individual tasks → Parallel async execution via LangGraph → Land diligence output delivered.