Deedy Das (Glean) on enterprise search architecture, the employee portal evolution, and why simple LLM-drop-in fails
Employees at most companies cannot efficiently find internal documents and knowledge the way Google employees can with internal tools like MoMA — knowledge is scattered across 10–100 SaaS apps with no unified retrieval layer, a gap that worsened with remote work.
Earlier enterprise search attempts were on-prem and lacked modern SaaS API integrations, and more recent startups that simply drop in LLMs and embeddings still fail to produce quality results without rigorous ranking and tuning work.
Glean became a unicorn with customers including Databricks, Canva, Confluent, Duolingo, and Samsara, with users reporting they cannot go back to a working life without internal search.
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
Glean became a unicorn with customers including Databricks, Canva, Confluent, Duolingo, and Samsara, with users reporting they cannot go back to a working life without internal search.
What tools did this team use?
elastic, LLMs, Slack, Jira, GitHub.
What results were reported?
Stack Overflow traffic decline (attributed to ChatGPT, not Glean): 15% (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
Earlier enterprise search attempts were on-prem and lacked modern SaaS API integrations, and more recent startups that simply drop in LLMs and embeddings still fail to produce quality results without rigorous ranking…
How is this back office ops AI workflow structured?
SaaS data indexing via APIs → Hybrid search query processing → Personalization and ranking layer → Unified feed and mentions delivery.