eBay develops e-Llama: continued pretraining of Llama 3.1 for e-commerce domain adaptation
General-purpose LLMs like GPT-4 and Claude are too costly and introduce data security risks for eBay's scale; they also lack e-commerce domain knowledge, while training a new LLM from scratch is prohibitively time- and resource-intensive.
Third-party LLMs such as GPT-4 and Claude were found impractical for eBay's needs due to cost, data security risks, and limited fine-tuning on proprietary data.
The e-Llama models achieve approximately 25% improvement in e-commerce benchmarks for English and about 30% for non-English, while retaining general-domain performance with only 1% degradation on NLU benchmarks for the 70B model.
Show all 6 reported metrics
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
The e-Llama models achieve approximately 25% improvement in e-commerce benchmarks for English and about 30% for non-English, while retaining general-domain performance with only 1% degradation on NLU benchmarks for th…
What tools did this team use?
Llama 3.1, Megatron-LM, flash-attention-2, NVIDIA H100, NVLink, InfiniBand.
What results were reported?
e-commerce benchmark improvement (English): approximately 25%; e-commerce benchmark improvement (non-English): about 30%; general domain NLU benchmark degradation (e-Llama 70B): 1%; Total training tokens: 1 trillion tokens (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
Third-party LLMs such as GPT-4 and Claude were found impractical for eBay's needs due to cost, data security risks, and limited fine-tuning on proprietary data.
How is this ecommerce ops AI workflow structured?
Identify LLM adaptation need → Collect and filter e-commerce data → Train e-commerce domain classifier → Continued pretraining on domain data → Optimize training setup via experiments → Instruction-tune with human feedback → Deploy e-Llama for AI initiatives.