Faire fine-tunes Llama3-8b to scale semantic search relevance measurement to 70M predictions per day
Evaluating search relevance at Faire was a manual, expensive, and slow process limited to monthly human-labeled snapshots, making it hard to scale and act on relevance signals as the search ecosystem grew more complex with personalization.
Prompt engineering alone could not capture Faire's definition of semantic search relevance, and the fine-tuned GPT solution was increasingly constrained by external API costs, limiting throughput for labeling.
The fine-tuned Llama3-8b model achieves a 28% improvement in Krippendorff's Alpha over the existing GPT production model and enables 70 million relevance predictions per day using 16 GPUs, making relevance a measurable and actionable dimension across all retailer search sessions.
Show all 7 reported metrics
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
The fine-tuned Llama3-8b model achieves a 28% improvement in Krippendorff's Alpha over the existing GPT production model and enables 70 million relevance predictions per day using 16 GPUs, making relevance a measurabl…
What tools did this team use?
Llama2-7b, Llama2-13b, GPT, DeepSpeed, A100 GPU, Fireworks.ai.
What results were reported?
Daily relevance predictions: 70 million predictions per day; Llama3-8b vs Llama2-7b performance gains: 1.4% to 8%; Krippendorff's Alpha (GPT production model): 0.56; query-product pairs labeled per hour (GPT model): ~300k query product pairs per hour (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
Prompt engineering alone could not capture Faire's definition of semantic search relevance, and the fine-tuned GPT solution was increasingly constrained by external API costs, limiting throughput for labeling.
How is this ecommerce ops AI workflow structured?
Human-labeled ground truth → Llama3-8b fine-tuning with LoRA → ESCI relevance classification → Self-hosted batch inference → Downstream search optimization.