Fort HealthCare automates prior authorizations with 91% success rate using Notable
Fort HealthCare's ambulatory surgery center faced 2X the prior authorization volume relative to on-site staff capacity, with several weeks of backlogged submissions delaying patient care, and 38% of calls at one clinic going to voicemail, forcing patients to call repeatedly and doubling staff workload.
source quote
source quote
source quote
source quote
source quote
After deploying Notable, 91% of prior authorizations are successfully submitted, saving 15 minutes per successful submission.
The registration process reached a 74% digital completion rate with more than 5% fewer cancellations. The system went live in four weeks.
Show all 7 reported metrics
Compare to your context
Tell us your scale, team, and constraints. We'll show what changes at your size, what fails at your scale, and whether this case is a fit, needs adaptation, or won't scale to you. Free demo, no signup.
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
After deploying Notable, 91% of prior authorizations are successfully submitted, saving 15 minutes per successful submission.
What tools did this team use?
Notable, OCR.
What results were reported?
Prior authorization success rate: 91%; Digital completion rate: 74%; Cancellation reduction: more than 5%; Time saved per prior auth submission: 15 minutes (source-reported, not independently verified).
How is this prior authorization AI workflow structured?
Prior auth request received → OCR reads all documentation → Documentation appended for payer → Submit to payer portal or e-fax → Approval written to EHR.
Related prior authorization cases
Now compare it to your context
This case is one data point. Whether its pattern fits you depends on your volumes, your stack, and your exception load — that comparison is the step no case study can do for you.