Frame.io uses Intercom to provide personalized support to 2M customers
Frame.io's customer base grew more than 11 times in size, creating pressure to scale support beyond the founding team. Previous tools Help Scout and Zendesk each fell short: Help Scout's ticketing wasn't suitable for their needs, and Zendesk required significant design and engineering resources to configure.
Help Scout's ticketing solution was not suitable for Frame.io's needs, and Zendesk required design and engineering resources to configure rather than being a plug-and-play solution.
First-response time was reduced from 3 hours to 15 minutes (an 87.5% reduction), the team now supports two million customers handling 4,500 conversations per month, and workload management improved team morale.
Show all 9 reported metrics
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
First-response time was reduced from 3 hours to 15 minutes (an 87.5% reduction), the team now supports two million customers handling 4,500 conversations per month, and workload management improved team morale.
What tools did this team use?
Intercom, Custom Bots, Help Scout, Zendesk.
What results were reported?
First-response time reduction: 87.5%; First-response time before: 3 hours; First-response time after: 15 minutes; Customers supported: two million (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
Help Scout's ticketing solution was not suitable for Frame.io's needs, and Zendesk required design and engineering resources to configure rather than being a plug-and-play solution.
How is this customer support AI workflow structured?
Customer reaches out → Self-serve help center → Custom Bot handles FAQs → Auto-assign via workload management → Agent handles conversation → Proactive customer alerts → Conversation tag analysis.