Sales ops · Production

How Granicus Doubled Win Rates with AI-Powered Account Scoring

The problem

Granicus's account scoring model, in place since 2017, had grown stale — it was static, used only 5-10 variables, and did not leverage modern AI or machine learning, resulting in decreased sales team engagement and a narrowing gap between high- and low-target accounts.

First attempt

The existing static model with only 5-10 variables was no longer effective, causing decreased sales team engagement and eroding scoring differentiation between high- and low-target accounts.

Workflow diagram · grounded in source
1
Multi-source data ingestion
trigger
“Incorporates over 50 different variables, including CRM data, website information, federal agency data, and more”
2
ML propensity scoring
ai_action
“Utilizes advanced machine learning techniques to identify patterns and predict propensity to buy”
3
Salesforce real-time sync
integration
“Integrates seamlessly with Salesforce for real-time updates and easy access for sales teams”
4
Dynamic model refresh
feedback_loop
“Adapts dynamically as new data becomes available, ensuring the model stays current”
5
High-target account identification
output
“We're now able to identify high-target accounts for us that have sort of double the win rate from what our average is”
Reported outcome

The new AI-powered scoring model produced a 200% increase in win rates for high-target accounts, revealed that 25-30% of pipeline efforts had been directed at low win-rate accounts enabling better resource allocation, and drove adoption across sales, marketing, and executive teams.

Reported metrics
Win rate increase for high-target accounts200%
Pipeline spend on low win-rate accounts25-30%
Territory planning improvementImproved territory planning and go-to-market strategies
Model adoption across teamsIncreased adoption and trust in the model
Reported stack
PursuitSalesforce
Source
https://pursuit.us/case-studies/granicus
Read source ↗

Frequently asked questions

What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?

The new AI-powered scoring model produced a 200% increase in win rates for high-target accounts, revealed that 25-30% of pipeline efforts had been directed at low win-rate accounts enabling better resource allocation,…

What tools did this team use?

Pursuit, Salesforce.

What results were reported?

Win rate increase for high-target accounts: 200%; Pipeline spend on low win-rate accounts: 25-30%; Territory planning improvement: Improved territory planning and go-to-market strategies; Model adoption across teams: Increased adoption and trust in the model (source-reported, not independently verified).

What failed first in this deployment?

The existing static model with only 5-10 variables was no longer effective, causing decreased sales team engagement and eroding scoring differentiation between high- and low-target accounts.

How is this sales ops AI workflow structured?

Multi-source data ingestion → ML propensity scoring → Salesforce real-time sync → Dynamic model refresh → High-target account identification.