Hopper reduces first response times by 50% and increases CSAT by 10% with Kustomer
Hopper's growing support operation could not dynamically route conversations based on urgency or customer data, had no visibility into support volume for staffing forecasts, and relied on 13 fragmented tools that frustrated agents and delayed travelers.
Hopper's existing support platform lacked flexible routing and data visibility, causing agent frustration, traveler delays, and a loss of confidence in the ability to scale with demand surges.
After moving to Kustomer, Hopper achieved a 10% CSAT increase, a 50% reduction in first response time, a 20% reduction in software costs by consolidating 13 legacy tools, and a 20% rise in positive support experiences.
Show all 5 reported metrics
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
After moving to Kustomer, Hopper achieved a 10% CSAT increase, a 50% reduction in first response time, a 20% reduction in software costs by consolidating 13 legacy tools, and a 20% rise in positive support experiences.
What tools did this team use?
Kustomer.
What results were reported?
CSAT score: 10%; First response time: 50%; Customer service software costs: 20%; Positive support experiences: 20% (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
Hopper's existing support platform lacked flexible routing and data visibility, causing agent frustration, traveler delays, and a loss of confidence in the ability to scale with demand surges.
How is this customer support AI workflow structured?
Customer contacts support → Priority-based routing → Agent views unified customer timeline → Real-time staffing visibility.