Influitive returns to Gong after competitor lacked deal intelligence and analytics
After switching from Gong to a competitor, Influitive lost the bird's-eye view of their sales cycle—deal management became harder, finding insights was difficult, and the team was left with only a basic call recording tool.
The competitor solution was not built with the sales rep in mind and offered only basic call recording, without the deal management, pipeline visibility, or analytics that Gong provided.
Returning to Gong restored full sales cycle visibility, enabled automated training triggers for a new cross-sell initiative, and gave leadership direct analytics on team OKR adoption and unfiltered customer feedback for product and marketing teams.
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
Returning to Gong restored full sales cycle visibility, enabled automated training triggers for a new cross-sell initiative, and gave leadership direct analytics on team OKR adoption and unfiltered customer feedback f…
What tools did this team use?
Gong.
What results were reported?
Deal management efficiency (competitor period): couldn't manage my deals as efficiently; Sales team productivity (competitor period): lost a major productivity tool; Retention impact: direct line to our retention at the end of the day; Sales process and cycle impact: changed every single facet of not only our sales process but our sales cycle (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
The competitor solution was not built with the sales rep in mind and offered only basic call recording, without the deal management, pipeline visibility, or analytics that Gong provided.
How is this sales ops AI workflow structured?
Sales cycle visibility → Cross-call term search → Training adoption triggers → Async call review → Team performance analytics → Customer voice shared cross-team.