Quality assurance · Production

Labelbox AI data platform: RL training data, custom evals, robotics data, and expert annotation network

The problem

(not stated)

Workflow diagram · grounded in source
1
RL post-training data delivery
output
“From reward signals to preference pairs, we deliver the data your models need to learn.”
2
Custom model evaluation
validation
“Private AGI benchmarks Custom assessments for frontier capabilities before public releaseArena evals Head-to-head model comparisons with human preference judgments”
3
Expert human annotation
human_review
“Alignerr expert network Elite human intelligence, on demand.”
Reported outcome

(not stated)

Reported metrics
leading US AI labs partneredover 80%
knowledge workers in Alignerr network1.5M+
Countries represented in network40+
Domains covered in network200+
Show all 7 reported metrics
leading US AI labs partneredover 80%
knowledge workers in Alignerr network1.5M+
countries represented in network40+
domains covered in network200+
PhDs in network50K+
Master's degrees in network200K+
licensed professionals in network85K+
Reported stack
Alignerr
Source
https://labelbox.com/product/mode/foundry//
Read source ↗

Frequently asked questions

What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?

(not stated)

What tools did this team use?

Alignerr.

What results were reported?

leading US AI labs partnered: over 80%; knowledge workers in Alignerr network: 1.5M+; Countries represented in network: 40+; Domains covered in network: 200+ (source-reported, not independently verified).

How is this quality assurance AI workflow structured?

RL post-training data delivery → Custom model evaluation → Expert human annotation.