LLMOps in restricted BYO networks using Azure Machine Learning with conditional continuous evaluation
The team needed to establish an LLMOps and continuous evaluation pipeline in a restricted bring-your-own network, facing service configuration complexity, SDK limitations in private networks, and a 6-hour end-to-end evaluation run that blocked deployments on every commit.
The AML managed endpoint did not work with the private network and required a fallback to Docker packaging; the pfazure SDK had compute host resolution issues; and obtaining Service Principal permissions was a lengthy process.
The team implemented a CI/CE/CD pipeline with an opt-out mechanism for the long-running E2E evaluation, allowing the ~30-minute minimal dataset run to proceed before every dev deployment while the full ~6-hour evaluation runs in parallel.
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
The team implemented a CI/CE/CD pipeline with an opt-out mechanism for the long-running E2E evaluation, allowing the ~30-minute minimal dataset run to proceed before every dev deployment while the full ~6-hour evaluat…
What tools did this team use?
Prompt Flow, Azure Machine Learning, pfazure SDK, Azure Container Registry, Azure Web App, Docker, GitHub.
What results were reported?
full E2E evaluation run duration: ~6hrs; minimal dataset E2E run duration: ~30 mins (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
The AML managed endpoint did not work with the private network and required a fallback to Docker packaging; the pfazure SDK had compute host resolution issues; and obtaining Service Principal permissions was a lengthy…
How is this quality assurance AI workflow structured?
PR creation triggers CI → CI code quality validation → PR label gates E2E eval → Continuous evaluation runs → Data scientist reviews metrics → CD build and deployment.