Back office ops · Production

LogMeIn scales meeting data processing 1400% with super.AI humans-and-AI pipeline

The problem

LogMeIn was processing meeting recordings internally to power their Scopus.io meeting bot, but the internal team could not scale fast enough, forcing technical shortcuts and compromises to user experience.

First attempt

A pure AI approach would sacrifice output quality to achieve desired turnaround times, while a 100% human solution would not meaningfully accelerate throughput beyond their existing internal team.

Workflow diagram · grounded in source
1
Meeting data submitted via API
trigger
“super.AI provided an API that was used by LogMeIn to scale their production traffic in real-time”
2
Proprietary AI program processes recordings
ai_action
“super.AI took the data provided via the API and run it through our proprietary data program, processing the unstructured meeting recordings into structure meeting notes”
3
Human intelligence in the loop
human_review
“Thanks to our humans in the process solution, they could scale with the right amount of Human intelligence needed”
4
Real-time results delivered via API
output
“directly integrate the super.AI solution to their product via our API, which allowed them to get real time results”
Reported outcome

super.AI scaled LogMeIn's production traffic by 1400% and enabled a full 100% transition to the super.AI platform, freeing the LogMeIn team to focus on developing new product features and preparing for customer rollout.

Reported metrics
Production traffic scaling1400%
transition to super.AI platform100%
Reported stack
super.AIScopus.io
Source
https://super.ai/case-studies/logmein
Read source ↗

Frequently asked questions

What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?

super.AI scaled LogMeIn's production traffic by 1400% and enabled a full 100% transition to the super.AI platform, freeing the LogMeIn team to focus on developing new product features and preparing for customer rollout.

What tools did this team use?

super.AI, Scopus.io.

What results were reported?

Production traffic scaling: 1400%; transition to super.AI platform: 100% (source-reported, not independently verified).

What failed first in this deployment?

A pure AI approach would sacrifice output quality to achieve desired turnaround times, while a 100% human solution would not meaningfully accelerate throughput beyond their existing internal team.

How is this back office ops AI workflow structured?

Meeting data submitted via API → Proprietary AI program processes recordings → Human intelligence in the loop → Real-time results delivered via API.