PagerDuty's AI Data Engineering Team cuts on-call incidents by 30% with automated alert management
The on-call team faced high incident volumes with many non-actionable alerts requiring manual snoozing to monitor, and the load grew unsustainably as new services were continuously deployed.
After implementing configuration changes, the team cut on-call incidents by 30%, reduced mean time to acknowledge dramatically through better alert quality, and eliminated manual snoozing through automated rules.
Show all 5 reported metrics
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
After implementing configuration changes, the team cut on-call incidents by 30%, reduced mean time to acknowledge dramatically through better alert quality, and eliminated manual snoozing through automated rules.
What tools did this team use?
PagerDuty.
What results were reported?
On-call incident reduction: 30%; Incident volume: Significant reduction in incident volume; mean time to acknowledge (MTTA): dropped dramatically; High urgent incidents: Fewer false alarms (source-reported, not independently verified).
How is this incident management AI workflow structured?
Pull incidents insights report → Filter for unactionable incidents → Implement configuration changes → Automated incident snoozing → Rule inheritance for new services.