How Ramp Built LLM-Backed Expense Policy Agents Users Can Trust
Expense approval was a tedious, time-consuming task traditionally handled by managers, and applying LLMs in a finance product required careful design to avoid losing user trust through low-quality or unexpected outputs.
Since enabling the policy agent at Ramp, more than 65% of expense approvals are fully handled by the agent, with a feedback loop that reduces human workload and improves policy accuracy over time.
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
Since enabling the policy agent at Ramp, more than 65% of expense approvals are fully handled by the agent, with a feedback loop that reduces human workload and improves policy accuracy over time.
What tools did this team use?
LLM, workflow builder.
What results were reported?
Expense approvals handled by agent: more than 65%; Human workload over time: reduces the amount of work humans need to do over time; Policy accuracy: improves policy accuracy (source-reported, not independently verified).
How is this expense management AI workflow structured?
Expense submitted for approval → Policy agent evaluates expense → Reasoning and citations output → Uncertainty escalation → Deterministic rule guardrails → Feedback loop improves policy.