SafetyCulture gets serious about company OKRs with dbt Cloud
SafetyCulture's data transformation layer was split across LookML and Airflow with no testing or dependency management, leaving stakeholders confused about where to find reliable data. Mistrust and rework slowed time-to-insights, while 97% of first-time users dropped off after 28 days without an analytical explanation.
An attempt to schedule and orchestrate LookML models with Airflow quickly ran into accessibility and architecture challenges: the team had to manually build all dependency graphs and ended up with the transformation layer across two tools that only a few people could operate.
SafetyCulture rebuilt 80% of their data in dbt and cut average pipeline query time from 17 to 4 minutes.
Data team eNPS rose from -20 to +69, an 89-point increase. New customer retention beyond 28 days more than doubled from 3 to 6.5%, with a projected 40% increase in MAU.
Show all 11 reported metrics
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
SafetyCulture rebuilt 80% of their data in dbt and cut average pipeline query time from 17 to 4 minutes.
What tools did this team use?
dbt, Redshift, Tableau, Looker, LookML, Airflow, Salesforce, Qualtrics.
What results were reported?
data team eNPS: -20 to +69, an increase of 89 points; New customer retention: 2x increase; Data rebuilt using dbt: 80%; Redshift compute increase: 50% (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
An attempt to schedule and orchestrate LookML models with Airflow quickly ran into accessibility and architecture challenges: the team had to manually build all dependency graphs and ended up with the transformation l…
How is this back office ops AI workflow structured?
Scalability limit triggers rebuild → Redshift infrastructure redesign → Dbt transformation consolidation → AI customer variable analysis → Customer segment identification → Segments applied in Salesforce → Tableau goal-tracking dashboards.