Back office ops · Production

How Spendesk turned 90% adoption into embedded AI workflows with a champions program

The problem

After achieving 90% AI adoption, Spendesk found that depth of usage was uneven — most employees were using Dust as a generic chat replacement rather than in embedded workflows, and an initial limited rollout had created a perception that AI was only for certain roles.

First attempt

A summer hackathon that generated 11 new agents resulted in only 1 surviving after six months, with momentum evaporating almost immediately — demonstrating that burst-format events do not produce sustainable AI habits.

Workflow diagram · grounded in source
1
Company-wide platform deployment
Trigger
The Dust platform expanded from a limited pilot to the entire company by May 2025.
source quote
“By May, the platform had expanded company-wide”
2
Champions program formalized
Integration
Spendesk formalized a structured Champions Program with clear roles, dedicated time, and real accountability.
source quote
“Spendesk formalized what had been informal: a structured Champions Program with clear roles, dedicated time, and real accountability”
3
Department agents built
Ai action
Champions create agents for department-specific use cases and workflows.
source quote
“Build: Create agents for department-specific use cases and workflows”
4
Governance touchpoints
Feedback loop
Bi-weekly 30-minute meetings allow champions to share current use cases, ask questions, and learn from each other.
source quote
“Bi-weekly meetings (30 minutes): Champions share current use cases, ask questions, learn from each other”
5
Custom agents serve employees
Output
Employees use purpose-built agents created by Spendeskers for Spendeskers, tools that solve specific problems in specific workflows.
source quote
“They were using purpose-built agents created by Spendeskers for Spendeskers, tools that solve specific problems in specific workflows”
6
360 Customer View unification
Integration
An agent connects data that traditionally lives in separate systems: Salesforce, product databases, and other sources that don't naturally talk to each other.
source quote
“connects data that traditionally lives in separate systems: Salesforce, product databases, and other sources that don't naturally talk to each other”
Reported outcome

By December 2025, Spendesk achieved 93-94% monthly active users and 80%+ weekly retention, with 40%+ of messages going to purpose-built custom agents rather than generic LLM interactions.

Reported metrics
monthly active users (December 2025)93-94%
Weekly retention (key highlights)83%+
Weekly retention (results section)80%+
Messages sent to custom agents40%+
Show all 11 reported metrics
monthly active users (December 2025)93-94%
weekly retention (key highlights)83%+
weekly retention (results section)80%+
messages sent to custom agents40%+
AI Champions driving adoption13
initial AI adoption within six months90%
summer hackathon agents surviving after six monthsonly one of those 11 agents was still being used regularly
six-week hackathon agents still actively used8 agents created, 3 still actively used weeks later
AskProduct hallucinations reported since September2
monthly adoption by November80%
monthly active users by June65-70%
Reported stack
DustSalesforce
◆ Does this fit your context?

Compare to your context

Tell us your scale, team, and constraints. We'll show what changes at your size, what fails at your scale, and whether this case is a fit, needs adaptation, or won't scale to you. Free demo, no signup.

Compare to your context →
~30 seconds · free
Source
https://dust.tt/customers/how-spendesk-turned-90-adoption-into-embedded-ai-workflows-with-a-champions
Read source ↗

Frequently asked questions

What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?

By December 2025, Spendesk achieved 93-94% monthly active users and 80%+ weekly retention, with 40%+ of messages going to purpose-built custom agents rather than generic LLM interactions.

What tools did this team use?

Dust, Salesforce.

What results were reported?

monthly active users (December 2025): 93-94%; Weekly retention (key highlights): 83%+; Weekly retention (results section): 80%+; Messages sent to custom agents: 40%+ (source-reported, not independently verified).

What failed first in this deployment?

A summer hackathon that generated 11 new agents resulted in only 1 surviving after six months, with momentum evaporating almost immediately — demonstrating that burst-format events do not produce sustainable AI habits.

How is this back office ops AI workflow structured?

Company-wide platform deployment → Champions program formalized → Department agents built → Governance touchpoints → Custom agents serve employees → 360 Customer View unification.

WHAT TO DO WITH THIS

Now compare it to your context

This case is one data point. Whether its pattern fits you depends on your volumes, your stack, and your exception load — that comparison is the step no case study can do for you.