Forethought Solve helps Spordle deflect 21,000 chat inquiries at an 86% self-serve rate
Spordle's small support team could not handle cyclical peak-season ticket volumes reaching nearly 7,000 per month, forcing seven or eight additional employees to work as full-time support agents on top of their normal responsibilities, often for 14+ hour days. Daily volumes ranged from 350 to 600+ tickets, with customers waiting through a two-week backlog.
source quote
source quote
source quote
source quote
source quote
Since March 1, 2023, Spordle deflected 21,000 chat inquiries at an 86% self-serve rate.
Over 600 tickets were instantly resolved within the first week after implementation, and three months post-implementation the ROI reached 142%. Agents are no longer exhausted from dealing with heavy ticket volumes.
Show all 9 reported metrics
Compare to your context
Tell us your scale, team, and constraints. We'll show what changes at your size, what fails at your scale, and whether this case is a fit, needs adaptation, or won't scale to you. Free demo, no signup.
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
Since March 1, 2023, Spordle deflected 21,000 chat inquiries at an 86% self-serve rate.
What tools did this team use?
Forethought Solve, Workflow Builder, Forethought.
What results were reported?
chat deflections since March 2023: 21,000; Self-serve rate: 86%; ROI at 3 months post-implementation: 142%; Tickets instantly resolved in first week: 600+ (source-reported, not independently verified).
How is this customer support AI workflow structured?
Customer initiates chat → AI generates response → Bilingual language routing → Intent detection via Workflow Builder → Self-service resolution delivered.
Related customer support cases
Now compare it to your context
This case is one data point. Whether its pattern fits you depends on your volumes, your stack, and your exception load — that comparison is the step no case study can do for you.