Unify builds account qualification agents powered by LangGraph and LangSmith
Go-to-market teams needed a systematic way to research and qualify prospect accounts based on custom criteria, a task requiring web search, website visits, and multi-source synthesis that was not yet automated.
The initial agent version produced inconsistent results and made it difficult to analyze reasoning. The early UX showed only a spinner during agent runs, which became painful as runtimes grew.
Unify evolved to a plan-reflect-tools architecture with parallelized tool calls for speed and a real-time step-by-step UI showing the agent's decision-making, with LangSmith enabling experiment comparison across hundreds of examples with minimal in-house ML infrastructure.
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
Unify evolved to a plan-reflect-tools architecture with parallelized tool calls for speed and a real-time step-by-step UI showing the agent's decision-making, with LangSmith enabling experiment comparison across hundr…
What tools did this team use?
LangGraph, LangSmith, o1-preview, GPT-4o, 3.5 Sonnet.
What results were reported?
O1-preview planning step latency: up to 30-45 seconds; Agent runtime improvement from parallelized tool calls: one of the biggest speed boosts; Evaluation dataset scale: hundreds of examples (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
The initial agent version produced inconsistent results and made it difficult to analyze reasoning.
How is this sales ops AI workflow structured?
Account qualification request → AI plan generation → Reflect and web research loop → Qualified/not-qualified output → LangSmith experiment evaluation.