Wix runs 250 AI agent evals comparing docs vs skills for developer task completion
As AI agents became an increasingly important audience for developer documentation, Wix faced an unexamined assumption that purpose-built skills are superior to docs for guiding agents. Independent teams were creating skills without coordination with the underlying documentation, creating a parallel layer at risk of drifting from the actual product.
Skills with small mistakes—misaligned project scaffolding, errors in code snippets, and best-practice bloat—eroded their advantage over docs and in some cases dramatically increased token usage.
Agent-optimized docs improved CLI task completion from 67% to 87% while cutting token usage by 35%.
Well-aligned skills reduced tokens by 30-50% and time by 30%. The team adopted a framework treating optimized docs as the backbone and skills as a caching layer for common tasks.
Show all 18 reported metrics
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
Agent-optimized docs improved CLI task completion from 67% to 87% while cutting token usage by 35%.
What tools did this team use?
Wix MCP.
What results were reported?
CLI task completion rate (baseline): 67%; CLI task completion rate (optimized docs): 87%; Token usage reduction (CLI docs optimization): 35%; Wall-clock time reduction (CLI docs optimization): 9% (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
Skills with small mistakes—misaligned project scaffolding, errors in code snippets, and best-practice bloat—eroded their advantage over docs and in some cases dramatically increased token usage.
How is this workflow AI workflow structured?
Task assigned to sandboxed agent → Agent fetches docs or skills → Agent performs development task → Agent self-evaluates output → Metrics collection → Framework and eval loop.