Recruiting · Production

Workday and HireVue integration saves CHOP $667K and 6,743 hours annually in recruiting

The problem

CHOP's hiring process relied entirely on manual efforts with no standardization or ATS integration, making it difficult to qualify candidates, introducing data-entry errors at scale, and leaving candidates dissatisfied with the slow, unsecured process.

First attempt

CHOP's previous video interview vendor lacked Workday integration, and the manual interview link-sharing process allowed candidates to forward links to unqualified applicants.

Workflow diagram · grounded in source
1
ATS-integrated assessment launch
Integration
The team launches HireVue Assessments from within Workday without leaving the ATS.
▾ source quote
“The team is able to launch HireVue Assessments without having to leave their ATS”
2
Conversational AI prescreening
Ai action
HireVue's conversational AI prescreens candidates.
▾ source quote
“HireVue's conversational AI for prescreening”
3
Automated candidate engagement
Output
Automated texting and engagement pieces strengthen both candidate and recruiter experiences.
▾ source quote
“automated texting and engagement pieces to strengthen both our candidate and recruiter experiences”
4
OnDemand and live interviewing
Output
Candidates complete OnDemand and live interviews through the HireVue platform.
▾ source quote
“OnDemand and live interviewing”
5
Candidate self-scheduling
Output
Candidates self-schedule their interviews.
▾ source quote
“self-scheduling”
Reported outcome

CHOP saved $667,000 year-to-date and 6,743 hours per year by replacing phone screens, achieved 85 NPS and 92 CSAT, and saved 1695 hours annually through automation, with recruiters freed to focus on strategic hiring activities.

Reported metrics
Net Promoter Score (NPS)85
Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT)92
Annual time saving due to automation1695 hours
Cost savings year-to-date$667,000
Show all 5 reported metrics
Net Promoter Score (NPS)85
Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT)92
Annual time saving due to automation1695 hours
Cost savings year-to-date$667,000
Hours saved per year replacing phone screens6,743 hours
Reported stack
HireVueHireVue AssessmentsWorkday
◆ Does this fit your context?

Compare to your context

Tell us your scale, team, and constraints. We'll show what changes at your size, what fails at your scale, and whether this case is a fit, needs adaptation, or won't scale to you. Free demo, no signup.

Compare to your context →
~30 seconds · free
Source
https://www.hirevue.com/case-studies/chop
Read source ↗

Frequently asked questions

What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?

CHOP saved $667,000 year-to-date and 6,743 hours per year by replacing phone screens, achieved 85 NPS and 92 CSAT, and saved 1695 hours annually through automation, with recruiters freed to focus on strategic hiring a…

What tools did this team use?

HireVue, HireVue Assessments, Workday.

What results were reported?

Net Promoter Score (NPS): 85; Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT): 92; Annual time saving due to automation: 1695 hours; Cost savings year-to-date: $667,000 (source-reported, not independently verified).

What failed first in this deployment?

CHOP's previous video interview vendor lacked Workday integration, and the manual interview link-sharing process allowed candidates to forward links to unqualified applicants.

How is this recruiting AI workflow structured?

ATS-integrated assessment launch → Conversational AI prescreening → Automated candidate engagement → OnDemand and live interviewing → Candidate self-scheduling.

Related recruiting cases

WHAT TO DO WITH THIS

Now compare it to your context

This case is one data point. Whether its pattern fits you depends on your volumes, your stack, and your exception load — that comparison is the step no case study can do for you.

Browse the Recruiting cases →