legal_document_review · services · workflow
The 36 Group saves four weeks and £50,000 in trial preparation using Luminance AI
The 36 Group faced a tight court deadline requiring review of over 10,000 documents spanning decades of evidence, while their existing CCDCS system could not support real-time collaboration or efficient search, and the 20-person team had to work remotely during COVID-19.
How it works
Common implementation structure
How this type of workflow is generally built, generalized across documented cases — not tied to any one vendor's stack. Click any stage to read what happens there. Specific products that implement these stages appear in “Tools commonly seen” below.
Stage 1 · Document upload to platform
The team uploaded the full dataset in minutes and gained immediate access via a secure, cloud-based platform.
Tools used
LuminanceCCDCS
Outcome
The defense team saved four working weeks and £50,000 during the review and disclosure phase, and cross-examination bundles were compiled in minutes instead of a time-consuming manual task.
What failed first
The existing CCDCS platform could not support real-time collaboration or efficient search, and manual keyword searches through police files with cryptic filenames meant critical information was often missed.
Results
Time savedfour working weeks
Volume10,000+
Cost replaced£50,000
Grounding & classification
Source type: vendor customer story
25 fields verified against source quotes.
document aienterprise searchknowledge searchknowledge basefailure mode describedhuman review describedmetric backednamed customertools describedworkflow describedlegalcost reductioncycle time reductionemployee productivitytime savedvendor customer storylegal document reviewlegal opsdocument to recordhuman review queue