quality_assurance · finance · workflow
Rabbit Care cuts engineering cycle time by 50% and scales team 10x with LinearB
Rabbit Care needed to dramatically scale its remote engineering team in a single year while maintaining consistency and transparency, but lacked visibility into delivery timelines, suffered from inconsistent velocity, and was beset by slow code reviews and incorrect reviewer assignments.
How it works
Common implementation structure
How this type of workflow is generally built, generalized across documented cases — not tied to any one vendor's stack. Click any stage to read what happens there. Specific products that implement these stages appear in “Tools commonly seen” below.
Stage 1 · Monitor DORA metrics and indicators
Jeremy's team actively monitored DORA metrics and leading indicators, specifically PR Size and Review Time, using LinearB.
Tools used
LinearBgitStreamCode Experts
Outcome
With LinearB, Rabbit Care cut its ideal-to-production cycle time by 50%, is shipping code at twice the speed, can confidently predict project delivery timelines, and has seen a noticeable improvement in developer happiness and cross-departmental communication.
Results
Volumenoticeable improvement
Grounding & classification
Source type: vendor customer story
19 fields verified against source quotes, 2 dropped as unverifiable.
recommendation systemcode diff prhuman review describednamed customerproduction runtime claimedtools describedworkflow describedfinancial servicesinsurancecycle time reductionemployee productivitytime savedvendor customer storyquality assurancehuman review queue