recruiting · healthcare · workflow

Workday and HireVue integration saves CHOP $667K and 6,743 hours annually in recruiting

CHOP's hiring process relied entirely on manual efforts with no standardization or ATS integration, making it difficult to qualify candidates, introducing data-entry errors at scale, and leaving candidates dissatisfied with the slow, unsecured process.

How it works
Common implementation structure
How this type of workflow is generally built, generalized across documented cases — not tied to any one vendor's stack. Click any stage to read what happens there. Specific products that implement these stages appear in “Tools commonly seen” below.
Stage 1 · ATS-integrated assessment launch
The team launches HireVue Assessments from within Workday without leaving the ATS.
Tools used
HireVueHireVue AssessmentsWorkday · partner
Outcome

CHOP saved $667,000 year-to-date and 6,743 hours per year by replacing phone screens, achieved 85 NPS and 92 CSAT, and saved 1695 hours annually through automation, with recruiters freed to focus on strategic hiring activities.

What failed first

CHOP's previous video interview vendor lacked Workday integration, and the manual interview link-sharing process allowed candidates to forward links to unqualified applicants.

Results
Time saved1695 hours
Volume85
Cost replaced$667,000
Source

https://www.hirevue.com/case-studies/chop

How we source this →

Grounding & classification
Source type: vendor customer story
27 fields verified against source quotes.
conversational aifailure mode describedmetric backednamed customerproduction runtime claimedsource backedtools describedvendor confirmedworkflow describedhealthcareautomation ratecost reductioncustomer satisfactionemployee productivitytime savedvendor customer storyhr opsrecruitingintake to triage