ACS eliminates manual PO keying with Lido, reclaiming 30 hours per week at 99.5–100% accuracy
ACS receives purchase orders daily across PDFs, spreadsheets, images, and email text, requiring manual keying of line-item data into their ERP — a slow, error-prone process that consumed team bandwidth and risked downstream inventory discrepancies, order errors, shipment delays, and payment errors.
source quote
source quote
source quote
source quote
ACS eliminated manual keying, reclaimed 30 hours each week, and boosted team capacity by 85%; PO data now lands in the ERP with 100% accuracy within minutes, accelerating order processing and inventory updates without adding staff.
Show all 5 reported metrics
Compare to your context
Tell us your scale, team, and constraints. We'll show what changes at your size, what fails at your scale, and whether this case is a fit, needs adaptation, or won't scale to you. Free demo, no signup.
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
ACS eliminated manual keying, reclaimed 30 hours each week, and boosted team capacity by 85%; PO data now lands in the ERP with 100% accuracy within minutes, accelerating order processing and inventory updates without…
What tools did this team use?
Lido, ERP.
What results were reported?
Hours reclaimed per week: 30 hours each week; Team capacity boost: 85%; Extraction accuracy on typed docs: 99.5–100%; ERP data accuracy: 100% (source-reported, not independently verified).
How is this order processing AI workflow structured?
PO received in mixed formats → Lido extracts and standardizes PO data → Structured spreadsheet output → Automatic ERP upload.
Related order processing cases
Now compare it to your context
This case is one data point. Whether its pattern fits you depends on your volumes, your stack, and your exception load — that comparison is the step no case study can do for you.