Recruiting · Production

Elevo partners with Paradox to automate candidate screening and reduce time-to-schedule

The problem

Elevo's recruiters lacked time to properly connect with candidates and identify top potential fits, which led to high short-term turnover rates.

Workflow diagram · grounded in source
1
Paradox custom ATS deployment
integration
“Elevo partnered with Paradox to revitalize their hiring with AI automation, including a fully bespoke custom ATS that made high-volume mass action easy at scale”
2
AI candidate screening and expectation-setting
ai_action
“Elevo now leverages AI to automate the administrative work of candidate screening and expectation setting with just a button”
3
Recruiter candidate connection
output
“helping recruiters spend more time connecting with candidates and making better hires”
Reported outcome

Elevo now uses AI to automate candidate screening and expectation setting, freeing recruiters to spend more time connecting with candidates and making better hires, and achieving a decrease in time-to-schedule.

Reported metrics
Time-to-scheduledecrease in time-to-schedule
Reported stack
Paradoxcustom ATS
Source
https://www.paradox.ai/case-studies/elevo
Read source ↗

Frequently asked questions

What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?

Elevo now uses AI to automate candidate screening and expectation setting, freeing recruiters to spend more time connecting with candidates and making better hires, and achieving a decrease in time-to-schedule.

What tools did this team use?

Paradox, custom ATS.

What results were reported?

Time-to-schedule: decrease in time-to-schedule (source-reported, not independently verified).

How is this recruiting AI workflow structured?

Paradox custom ATS deployment → AI candidate screening and expectation-setting → Recruiter candidate connection.