The 36 Group saves four weeks and £50,000 in trial preparation using Luminance AI
The 36 Group faced a tight court deadline requiring review of over 10,000 documents spanning decades of evidence, while their existing CCDCS system could not support real-time collaboration or efficient search, and the 20-person team had to work remotely during COVID-19.
The existing CCDCS platform could not support real-time collaboration or efficient search, and manual keyword searches through police files with cryptic filenames meant critical information was often missed.
The defense team saved four working weeks and £50,000 during the review and disclosure phase, and cross-examination bundles were compiled in minutes instead of a time-consuming manual task.
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
The defense team saved four working weeks and £50,000 during the review and disclosure phase, and cross-examination bundles were compiled in minutes instead of a time-consuming manual task.
What tools did this team use?
Luminance, CCDCS.
What results were reported?
Working weeks saved: four working weeks; Cost saved in review and disclosure: £50,000; Documents reviewed: 10,000+; Cross-examination bundle compilation time: just minutes (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
The existing CCDCS platform could not support real-time collaboration or efficient search, and manual keyword searches through police files with cryptic filenames meant critical information was often missed.
How is this legal document review AI workflow structured?
Document upload to platform → AI document analysis → Conceptual search across documents → Adaptive review pattern learning → Cross-examination bundle compilation.