Leading EdTech enterprise scales ML training data annotation with Labelbox
Rapid pandemic growth created demand for hundreds of thousands of annotated text data items to train ML models, but the company's existing tools — Amazon SageMaker GroundTruth, Prodigy, and an in-house labeling tool — could not scale to meet that demand.
Previous annotation services including Amazon SageMaker GroundTruth and Prodigy, as well as an in-house tool, lacked transparency and offered no ability to revisit submitted labels, fix errors, or track labeler productivity — making them feel like a black box.
The company rapidly delivered hundreds of thousands of annotations in record speed while gaining full visibility into labeler productivity and training data quality; AI and ML also made the question-answering process smoother and helped speed up expert workflows.
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
The company rapidly delivered hundreds of thousands of annotations in record speed while gaining full visibility into labeler productivity and training data quality; AI and ML also made the question-answering process…
What tools did this team use?
Labelbox, Workforce, OCR, Amazon SageMaker GroundTruth, Prodigy.
What results were reported?
Annotations delivered: hundreds of thousands of annotations; Annotation delivery speed: record speed; Student learning and outcomes: boost student learning and outcomes (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
Previous annotation services including Amazon SageMaker GroundTruth and Prodigy, as well as an in-house tool, lacked transparency and offered no ability to revisit submitted labels, fix errors, or track labeler produc…
How is this data entry ops AI workflow structured?
Student screenshot responses → OCR to text conversion → In-house OCR accuracy comparison → Expert text annotation → QA with consensus tools → Productivity and quality tracking → AI-assisted question-answering.