MicroVention replaces incumbent CLM with Lexion to automate contract intake and enable on-demand reporting
MicroVention's previous CLM was too technical and saw little adoption: the repository was unsearchable, version control was chaotic, and other departments felt legal requests disappeared into a blackhole through a clunky intake process.
The incumbent CLM was so difficult to use that it saw little adoption, forcing the team to maintain duplicate contract copies on a separate shared drive and leaving most of its capabilities unused.
With Lexion, MicroVention automated contract intake and routing, enabled on-demand reporting on active contracts (previously taking six months to a year to set up), freed the legal team from being hands-on at every stage, and saved many hours on routine tasks.
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
With Lexion, MicroVention automated contract intake and routing, enabled on-demand reporting on active contracts (previously taking six months to a year to set up), freed the legal team from being hands-on at every st…
What tools did this team use?
Lexion.
What results were reported?
time to enable on-demand reports with prior CLM: six months to a year; Routine task time savings: saving MicroVention many hours spent on routine tasks (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
The incumbent CLM was so difficult to use that it saw little adoption, forcing the team to maintain duplicate contract copies on a separate shared drive and leaving most of its capabilities unused.
How is this contract management AI workflow structured?
Stakeholder submits intake form → Auto-select and generate contract → Route for review and approvals → AI-powered contract repository → On-demand contract reporting → Procurement NDA waiver automation.