Recruiting · Production
Nestlé uses Olivia to automate recruiting scheduling and save 8K hours annually
The problem
Nestlé's global recruiting teams were spending over 8,000 hours per month scheduling and rescheduling interviews, making the recruiting process time-consuming.
Workflow diagram · grounded in source
1
Candidate message on career site or mobile
trigger
“via quick messages right on the career site or a mobile device”
2
Olivia automates screening and scheduling
ai_action
“Olivia automates tasks like screening and interview scheduling via quick messages right on the career site or a mobile device”
Reported outcome
After implementing Olivia, Nestlé achieved a 600% increase in interviews scheduled year-over-year and saved 8K hours annually.
Reported metrics
Hours per month spent scheduling interviews (pre-implementation)over 8,000 hours per month
interviews scheduled YoY600%
Hours saved annually8K
Reported stack
Olivia
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
After implementing Olivia, Nestlé achieved a 600% increase in interviews scheduled year-over-year and saved 8K hours annually.
What tools did this team use?
Olivia.
What results were reported?
Hours per month spent scheduling interviews (pre-implementation): over 8,000 hours per month; interviews scheduled YoY: 600%; Hours saved annually: 8K (source-reported, not independently verified).
How is this recruiting AI workflow structured?
Candidate message on career site or mobile → Olivia automates screening and scheduling.