Recruiting ·

Royal College of Art connects global scholarship candidates via asynchronous video interviewing

The problem

RCA needed to connect geographically dispersed scholarship candidates to a global panel of arts experts across multiple time zones, with live video scheduling being unviable. Paper applications made it hard for candidates to show passion and difficult to engage the judging panel.

First attempt

RCA had relied solely on paper applications the previous year, which made it difficult for candidates to demonstrate passion and led to low engagement from the judging panel.

Workflow diagram · grounded in source
1
Candidates shortlisted globally
trigger
“a very geographically diverse shortlist of candidates to an external panel of seven sector experts in the arts world from all over the globe”
2
Asynchronous video responses recorded
output
“introduction of asynchronous video interviewing”
3
Panel reviews candidate videos
human_review
“judging panel who had both flexibility in how they viewed/collaborated along with being able to really assess the applicants' personalities and passion”
Reported outcome

RCA achieved a 100% response rate from long-listed candidates, and the judging panel responded very positively, praising the system as professional, easy to use, and flexible.

Reported metrics
Candidate response rate100%
Judging panel receptionfavorably received
Reported stack
HireVueSonru
Source
https://www.hirevue.com/case-studies/royal-college-of-art
Read source ↗

Frequently asked questions

What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?

RCA achieved a 100% response rate from long-listed candidates, and the judging panel responded very positively, praising the system as professional, easy to use, and flexible.

What tools did this team use?

HireVue, Sonru.

What results were reported?

Candidate response rate: 100%; Judging panel reception: favorably received (source-reported, not independently verified).

What failed first in this deployment?

RCA had relied solely on paper applications the previous year, which made it difficult for candidates to demonstrate passion and led to low engagement from the judging panel.

How is this recruiting AI workflow structured?

Candidates shortlisted globally → Asynchronous video responses recorded → Panel reviews candidate videos.