Nanonets AI extracts data from 140,000+ handwritten historical documents with 95% accuracy for SciencePo researcher
Florian Oswald needed to extract land usage and value data from over 140,000 handwritten historical documents with non-standard, intersecting table formats. Traditional OCR tools could not handle such formats, and manual processing would have taken months.
Traditional OCR tools were unable to capture data from the non-standard table format where rows and columns intersected.
The researcher extracted data with over 95% accuracy in just 2 hours using Nanonets AI, and was able to get started within a day.
Show all 5 reported metrics
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
The researcher extracted data with over 95% accuracy in just 2 hours using Nanonets AI, and was able to get started within a day.
What tools did this team use?
Nanonets AI, Automated Workflows.
What results were reported?
Extraction accuracy: over 95%; Time to extract data: 2 hours; Documents to process: 140,000+; Time to get started: in a day (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
Traditional OCR tools were unable to capture data from the non-standard table format where rows and columns intersected.
How is this data entry ops AI workflow structured?
Large-scale document extraction needed → AI extracts from unstructured docs → Post-processing rules validate output → High-accuracy data delivered.