Tucows uses Textio augmented writing to make job postings more inclusive
Tucows' job postings used language that unintentionally narrowed their applicant pool by gender and age, causing them to miss out on a broader range of talent as they ramped up hiring.
Within the first six months Tucows significantly improved their inclusivity scores and improved their applicant pipeline, particularly for women and across age groups.
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
Within the first six months Tucows significantly improved their inclusivity scores and improved their applicant pipeline, particularly for women and across age groups.
What tools did this team use?
Textio.
What results were reported?
Inclusivity improvement in first month: significant improvement; Inclusivity scores within six months: improve our scores significantly; Applicant pipeline: improve our applicant pipeline (source-reported, not independently verified).
How is this recruiting AI workflow structured?
Scale hiring, identify language gaps → Augmented writing tool flags non-inclusive terms → Revise job posts for broader appeal → Iterate and improve over six months.