Beyer Mechanical Reduces Invoice Processing Time by 60% and Transforms Month-End Close with Stampli
Beyer Mechanical's two AP clerks manually coded and routed 1,500 invoices per month using PaperSave, which was not integrated with their Sage Intacct ERP. The lack of integration caused unreliable PO matching, duplicate invoices slipping through, system stalls of 15–20 seconds per PO click, and chronic delays that prevented the books from closing on time.
PaperSave, the previous AP document management system, spent 45 days attempting to integrate with Sage Intacct without success, leaving PO matching unreliable and invoice coding entirely manual.
source quote
source quote
source quote
source quote
source quote
source quote
Stampli reduced invoice processing time by 60%, cut the invoice lifecycle from at least five days to 48 hours or less, and reduced monthly AP work from approximately 50 hours to half an hour.
AP clerk resource efficiencies improved by 33%, and Beyer closed its books by day 10 of month-end starting the very first month of use.
Show all 9 reported metrics
Compare to your context
Tell us your scale, team, and constraints. We'll show what changes at your size, what fails at your scale, and whether this case is a fit, needs adaptation, or won't scale to you. Free demo, no signup.
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
Stampli reduced invoice processing time by 60%, cut the invoice lifecycle from at least five days to 48 hours or less, and reduced monthly AP work from approximately 50 hours to half an hour.
What tools did this team use?
Stampli, PaperSave, Sage Intacct.
What results were reported?
Invoice processing time reduction: 60%; Invoice lifecycle: 48 hours or less per invoice (from at least five days); Invoice approval speed improvement: 60X faster; Invoice approval time: one second (from 60 to 120 seconds) (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
PaperSave, the previous AP document management system, spent 45 days attempting to integrate with Sage Intacct without success, leaving PO matching unreliable and invoice coding entirely manual.
How is this invoice processing AI workflow structured?
Invoice enters Stampli → AI coding and approver selection → Nightly PO import to Intacct → Automated PO matching → AP clerk reviews full or partial → Approved invoice sent to Intacct.
Related invoice processing cases
Now compare it to your context
This case is one data point. Whether its pattern fits you depends on your volumes, your stack, and your exception load — that comparison is the step no case study can do for you.