Beyer Mechanical reduces invoice processing time by 60% and transforms month-end close with Stampli
Beyer Mechanical's AP clerks manually coded and routed 1,500 invoices per month using PaperSave, which was not integrated with their Sage Intacct ERP. Each PO lookup caused a 15–20 second system stall, PO matching was unreliable, duplicate invoices went undetected, and the lengthy individual-approval process meant books could not be closed on time.
PaperSave spent 45 days attempting to integrate with Sage Intacct and failed, leaving PO matching unreliable and duplicates undetected.
Stampli reduced invoice processing time by 60%, cut the invoice lifecycle to 48 hours or less, enabled month-end close by day 10, improved AP clerk resource efficiencies by 33%, and compressed monthly AP processing from approximately 50 hours to half an hour.
Show all 14 reported metrics
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
Stampli reduced invoice processing time by 60%, cut the invoice lifecycle to 48 hours or less, enabled month-end close by day 10, improved AP clerk resource efficiencies by 33%, and compressed monthly AP processing fr…
What tools did this team use?
Stampli, PaperSave, Sage Intacct.
What results were reported?
Invoice processing time reduction: 60%; Invoice lifecycle: 48 hours or less per invoice; Previous invoice lifecycle: at least five days; Month-end close achieved by day: day 10 (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
PaperSave spent 45 days attempting to integrate with Sage Intacct and failed, leaving PO matching unreliable and duplicates undetected.
How is this invoice processing AI workflow structured?
Invoice capture via AI → AI coding and approver selection → Nightly PO import → AP clerk review → Send approved invoices to Intacct.