LILT cuts tooling costs 56% and reduces non-selling time 20-30% with Amplemarket AI sales platform
LILT's sales team faced fragmented tooling, manual non-selling tasks consuming 20-30% of rep time, inconsistent data quality, and a channel imbalance where 70-80% of meetings came from labor-intensive cold calls.
The legacy stack required reps to manually build lists, research accounts, and switch between Sales Navigator and Salesloft, creating workflow friction and cost inefficiency.
LILT achieved a 56% reduction in tooling costs, a 20-30% reduction in non-selling tasks, 35% of qualified meetings generated through Amplemarket, a +18% uplift in quota attainment, and a payback period of under 3 months.
Show all 8 reported metrics
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
LILT achieved a 56% reduction in tooling costs, a 20-30% reduction in non-selling tasks, 35% of qualified meetings generated through Amplemarket, a +18% uplift in quota attainment, and a payback period of under 3 months.
What tools did this team use?
Amplemarket, Sales Navigator, Salesloft.
What results were reported?
qualified meetings generated (Amplemarket share): 35%; Tooling cost reduction: 56%; Non-selling tasks reduction for reps: 20-30%; Quota attainment increase: +18% (source-reported, not independently verified).
What failed first in this deployment?
The legacy stack required reps to manually build lists, research accounts, and switch between Sales Navigator and Salesloft, creating workflow friction and cost inefficiency.
How is this sales outreach AI workflow structured?
ICP identification trigger → AI signal-based prospecting → Multi-channel sequence execution → AI sequencer automates outreach → Rep oversight layer → Pod multi-threading output.