Miro's peer feedback participation jumps from 50% to 93% in eight weeks using Zapier automation and AI-generated summaries
Miro's engineering peer feedback cycle had only 50% participation (roughly 400 reviews) because the formal HR system was painful: requesters received generic broadcast Slack messages pointing to unfamiliar HR software, reviewers could not see how many reviews they owed, and managers had to manually copy each review into a Google Doc one at a time.
Participation rose from 50% to 93% in eight weeks, and reviews grew from roughly 400 to over 1,600.
Each daily nudge lifted participation by roughly 10%.
Show all 5 reported metrics
Frequently asked questions
What did this team achieve with this AI workflow?
Participation rose from 50% to 93% in eight weeks, and reviews grew from roughly 400 to over 1,600.
What tools did this team use?
Zapier, Zapier Table, Zapier Paths, Google Sheets, Slack, Workday, Gemini Gem.
What results were reported?
Peer feedback participation rate: 50% to 93%; Reviews submitted: roughly 400 to over 1,600; Daily nudge participation lift: roughly 10%; Participation rate (alternate quoted figure): 43% to 93% (source-reported, not independently verified).
How is this hr ops AI workflow structured?
Personal DM nomination → Scheduled nudges and self-check pull → AI summary generation → HTML email delivery → Workday batch upload → Live adoption dashboard → Gemini Gem onboarding check-in → Off-track doorbell escalation.